4 ms·

it's EXTREMELY bizarre that they would not have seriously thought of it. Unless they all share the same opinions as Eich and they feel that being against gay m

by jrs99 13y ago

it's EXTREMELY bizarre that they would not have seriously thought of it. Unless they all share the same opinions as Eich and they feel that being against gay marriage is like being against anchovies on your pizza. Then it would never have hit them that this was a serious problem.

davidgerard 13y ago
I think stupidity is a sufficient explanation. "I'm envisioning the board standing around with glassy stares, 'I have no idea how this could have happened. We totally vetted his geek cred.'" - rone
- jrs99 13y ago
  But, at the same time, it still had to not bother them sufficiently enough to raise serious questions. To me, it's like watching someone kick a puppy and then considering him for CEO. "hey, how about this guy? He kicked a puppy." "Is there anything about him that we need to be aware of?" "no, not that I know of."
pbhjpbhj 13y ago
Is it right to not employ someone because of their legally held beliefs with regard to sexual behaviour? Is HN [amongst others] calling for all people who disagree with legislation on homosexual relationships being called marriage to forfeit their rights to employment; or perhaps all those that consider homosexual sexual activity to be wrong? That seems like the logical conclusion here. Is this going to be continued with all beliefs - ousting those that disprove of drunkennes or drug taking or polygamy or adultery? Why should a company pry in to an employee's private beliefs and associations in the way you're suggesting?
- jrs99 13y ago
  This is more of an opinion about what is best for Mozilla's image in the public eye, not about anyone's right to have a job. You can without a doubt hire a murderer as your CEO. It will always be my opinion that you should at least think very hard about doing so before you make the final decision. If you run for president and you're a satan worshipper, then it would be my opinion that you will lose. If you own a cookie company and want to hire a murderer as a CEO, it would simply be my opinion that you may lose sales. If you don't care about my opinion, or don't care about sales, and go ahead and hire a murderer as CEO, then that's perfectly fine. At the end of the day, it's really up to you. But if someone out there wants to organize a boycott because the CEO isn't a vegan, that's also fine.

by jrs99 13y ago

davidgerard 13y ago

I think stupidity is a sufficient explanation. "I'm envisioning the board standing around with glassy stares, 'I have no idea how this could have happened. We totally vetted his geek cred.'" - rone

jrs99 13y ago
But, at the same time, it still had to not bother them sufficiently enough to raise serious questions. To me, it's like watching someone kick a puppy and then considering him for CEO. "hey, how about this guy? He kicked a puppy." "Is there anything about him that we need to be aware of?" "no, not that I know of."

pbhjpbhj 13y ago

Is it right to not employ someone because of their legally held beliefs with regard to sexual behaviour? Is HN [amongst others] calling for all people who disagree with legislation on homosexual relationships being called marriage to forfeit their rights to employment; or perhaps all those that consider homosexual sexual activity to be wrong? That seems like the logical conclusion here. Is this going to be continued with all beliefs - ousting those that disprove of drunkennes or drug taking or polygamy or adultery? Why should a company pry in to an employee's private beliefs and associations in the way you're suggesting?

jrs99 13y ago
This is more of an opinion about what is best for Mozilla's image in the public eye, not about anyone's right to have a job. You can without a doubt hire a murderer as your CEO. It will always be my opinion that you should at least think very hard about doing so before you make the final decision. If you run for president and you're a satan worshipper, then it would be my opinion that you will lose. If you own a cookie company and want to hire a murderer as a CEO, it would simply be my opinion that you may lose sales. If you don't care about my opinion, or don't care about sales, and go ahead and hire a murderer as CEO, then that's perfectly fine. At the end of the day, it's really up to you. But if someone out there wants to organize a boycott because the CEO isn't a vegan, that's also fine.