6 ms·
Isn't this just intolerant of his own views and morals? He's free to have those, last I checked.
by trebor 13y ago
Isn't this just intolerant of his own views and morals? He's free to have those, last I checked.
- jrs235 13y agoTimes have changed. It use to be you were only allowed to have (and voice) popular views and beliefs. Today you are not allowed to have (and voice) unpopular views and beliefs.
- futurist 13y agoAccording to these folks, it's okay to have your own views and morals. That is, as long as it is politically correct.
- jnbiche 13y agoCan you expound on what you mean by "these folks"?
- mister_m 13y agoIf his views and morals clash with basic human rights, then he deserves whatever "intolerant" reactions he receives.
- keeshawn 13y agoNo. People are free to associate with whomever they wish. Just as Mozilla is free to appoint an anti-gay CEO, those of us who disagree with that direction are free to go elsewhere when we choose to contribute to an open-source project.
- HelloMcFly 13y agoOf course he is. That doesn't make a boycott wrong, or the those who boycott "intolerant." Further the causes you wish to further, but be aware that as a consumer I may choose to withhold direct or indirect support based on your decisions. That's fair for everyone.
- transitionality 13y agoTrying to get someone fired because you disagree with their political stance is both intolerant and bigoted. It is political oppression.