4 ms·
I'm a bit surprised at the amount of positive response. This impresses me as rather obnoxious, probably effective, but obnoxious. Something between the pop-over
by incision 13y ago
I'm a bit surprised at the amount of positive response. This impresses me as rather obnoxious, probably effective, but obnoxious. Something between the pop-over ad and the ever-present network TV promotional crawl brought to the masses.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- rkuykendall-com 13y agoI see your point, but I see it as providing context to the links. This is especially useful on Twitter where there is so little room for commentary. The message is not showing up for no reason. You clicked a link from someone you follow, because you wanted to usually BECAUSE of how that content relates to them. Sure, if you just change every link you send out to a link with an ad at the bottom that is bad. But I see no problem with adding context and commentary to a link someone is sharing on social media for that exact reason.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- opendais 13y agoI'm not. Marketing has a purpose like anything else. I'm more surprised and concerned by how few people commented on the fact it is relying on sites being vulnerable to clickjacking to function. Maybe I'm just overly paranoid?