> Though his point about Bitcoin may be valid, we should take it with a grain of salt. Why? His point is valid. Just because something is digital doesn't make

> Though his point about Bitcoin may be valid, we should take it with a grain of salt. Why? His point is valid. Just because something is digital doesn't make it magical and certainly doesn't make it a good idea. For all intents and purposes, the dollar has been digital for a while. Certainly, there is the analog equivalent and certainly it is centralized, but it's definitely digital. I want a pure decentralized digital currency as much as the next guy, but bitcoin is definitely not there yet.