4 ms·
Well spotted. To be honest, I'd be pissed off if I found out GCHQ had repurposed my project for this sort of thing. Not really possible to fix this situation e
by d0 13y ago
Well spotted. To be honest, I'd be pissed off if I found out GCHQ had repurposed my project for this sort of thing.
Not really possible to fix this situation either as "do no evil" license clauses are pointless.
- __alexs 13y agoIf it was GPL you might be able to argue that they violated the derivatives clause. I doubt it would help since this is top secret intel work and I'm sure they have legal loop holes that essentially allow them to ignore things as trivial as copyright when it suits them.
- eurleif 13y agohttps://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePo...
- __alexs 13y agos/GPL/AGPL/ Which raises the question of whether or not a program that passively wiretaps you falls under the provision of network services clause in that :)
- psykovsky 13y agoSeeing as they talk about the pirate bay as an example of a target I would suspect they care A LOT about copyright issues and would do anything in their power to distribute their source code for the greater good.
- e12e 13y agoThis blanket surveillance reminds me of this interview with Pete Seeger: RetroBites: Pete Seeger - Black List https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0_IME9WsHQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0_IME9WsHQ
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]