4 ms·
The second bullet is important, having up to date TLS is a big deal in today's security/spy conscience world. Its possible to currently get (if you monkey aroun
by valarauca1 13y ago
The second bullet is important, having up to date TLS is a big deal in today's security/spy conscience world. Its possible to currently get (if you monkey around in about:config), but default settings are powerful since the average user won't bother. And I mean average-user type average user, not average hackernews reader/poster.
- pixl97 13y agoIt is good, now all the latest major browsers support TLS1.2 with forward secrecy. It is unfortunate that IE doesn't put FS suits first though. For you Windows server operators out there, I suggest IISCrypto to order your cipher selection (this works on desktop versions of Windows too). https://www.nartac.com/Products/IISCrypto/ https://www.nartac.com/Products/IISCrypto/
- erichurkman 13y agoHow's My SSL? [1] now reports "Your SSL client is Probably Okay." for Firefox 27. Awesome! [1] https://www.howsmyssl.com/ https://www.howsmyssl.com/
- joveian 13y agoAn error occurred during a connection to www.howsmyssl.com. Peer attempted old style (potentially vulnerable) handshake. I don't think I would trust their judgement about how my SSL is doing. I am happy about this Firefox release; it is not just that you had to be an advanced user to get TLS 1.2 previously but that doing so would break over half the web. Now it is possible to use TLS 1.2 where available and not use it when not available.
- gaius 13y agoMaybe that was it probing you?
- hnwhatevz 13y agoFedora 20 (firefox 26), "Your SSL client is Bad." :(
- skion 13y agoI just fixed that by setting: security.tls.version.max = 3 security.tls.version.min = 1 security.ssl3.rsa_fips_des_ede3_sha = false in about:config, after which it also said "Probably good" for FF26.
- takeda 13y agoExcept how many people trust absolutely every single CA in the huge list that browser comes with. It only takes one of them (or even a single intermediate CA that is listed by them) to sign a malicious key and the whole system is compromised. And it already happened few times (ex. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DigiNotar#Issuance_of_fraudulent_certificates http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DigiNotar#Issuance_of_fraudulen...). Imagine what US government agency can do.