3 ms·
When drivers accept a call, furthermore, they need to interface with the app. The suit goes on to note that under California law, it is illegal to use a
by Zikes 13y ago
When drivers accept a call, furthermore, they need to
interface with the app. The suit goes on to note that
under California law, it is illegal to use a “wireless
telephone” while driving unless it is specifically
configured to be hands-free — which the app is not. In
essence, the suit argues that Uber was negligent in the
“development, implementation and use of the app” so as
to cause the driver to be distracted and inattentive.
- Dylan16807 13y agoIs that driver in the specific? I thought it was the general case. Okay with a more thorough search I found an actual claim of the specific driver being distracted on page 9 of the suit, not sure why I didn't find it before.