4 ms·
A cabbie on his way home is disanalogous to this situation. A more valid analogy would be a cab, without a passenger on-board, responding to a call to pick som
by rosser 13y ago
A cabbie on his way home is disanalogous to this situation.
A more valid analogy would be a cab, without a passenger on-board, responding to a call to pick someone up. Turning right onto the street the prospective fare lives, the car strikes pedestrians who have a walk signal.
Whose liability insurance covers that?
- Dylan16807 13y agoNo. A valid analogy to a cab responding to a call is an uber driver responding to a call. Which is almost certainly liable. An uber driver with no call has no reason to be moving as far as I know.
- rosser 13y ago...an uber driver responding to a call. ...which, per TFA, Mr. Muzaffar was.
- Dylan16807 13y agoI don't see that in the article. I only see 'logged in'. And it doesn't fit with uber not even knowing if the death involved a driver until they got his name.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]