3 ms·

Sure, but why not mandate that everyone tunes the same compiler?...

• mikeash 13y ago
  I'll flip the question around: why mandate it? The class clearly has a performance component, and so students were expected to learn about optimization. Are they going to learn optimization better or worse if you mandate a single compiler? If merely switching compilers is the best path to performance, is that not a valuable lesson? If switching compilers and doing a bunch of extra work to make the code fast with the new compiler is the best path to performance, have they not learned a great deal?
  • scott_karana 13y ago
    Some compilers aren't generally available. Hypothetically, what if ICC wasn't available freely to educational users, but some of the students had side-jobs where they used it? You can always mandate a large set of compilers, make them all available, and leave it up to the students to determine which is fastest. I think that acheives both the competitive/educational goal and the level playing field goal.
    • mikeash 13y ago
      I would definitely ban using any compiler that wasn't generally available to the class, or at least disqualify their output from winning the contest. I'd take a generic approach where it's worded just like that, rather than trying to come up with an official set of acceptable compilers, though.
      • scott_karana 13y ago
        Sounds fair enough. I suppose we're really on the same page after all. :)
        • mikeash 13y ago
          Sounds good! Just remember, if the Internet Police show up, this never happened.