3 ms·

I'd consider vibratory feedback to be a subset of haptics, so no argument there. My point is 'haptic feedback' - as with 'responsive design' - is in the proces

I'd consider vibratory feedback to be a subset of haptics, so no argument there. My point is 'haptic feedback' - as with 'responsive design' - is in the process of getting its meaning thinned down due to the limitations of the technology with which it's getting commercialized. Haptics means much more than just vibrating devices, as your own definition supports. But in practice, we're redefining it with a much smaller scope.

edent 13y ago
That's very true. I had a play with Senseg a couple of years ago. Precision vibration with different "textures". Can't understand why the technology hasn't made it mainstream yet. http://shkspr.mobi/blog/2012/05/senseg-feelable-touchscreen-video/ http://shkspr.mobi/blog/2012/05/senseg-feelable-touchscreen-...