4 ms·
Jakob Nielsen's research on "ideal size" is 48Kx32K (1200 dpi) @ 1200 fps for perfect image quality. See http://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-much-bandwidth-is-
by espeed 13y ago
Jakob Nielsen's research on "ideal size" is 48Kx32K (1200 dpi) @ 1200 fps for perfect image quality.
See http://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-much-bandwidth-is-enough-a-tbps/ http://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-much-bandwidth-is-enough...
His 2012 recommendation was 30" or larger screens for knowledge workers (http://www.nngroup.com/articles/computer-screens-getting-bigger/ http://www.nngroup.com/articles/computer-screens-getting-big...).
- fosap 13y ago120 fps, not 1200 fps
- Gravityloss 13y agoOnly 120 fps actually in the article. He also doesn't talk about the color space, only about the granularity. But anyway, quite nice that there are articles that take a little bit of a human point of view and not just the usual "existing technology, just 20% better is good enough for everyone"
- leoc 13y agoIt seems there's already a monitor which offers to upscale your 120Hz signal to 240Hz: http://www.eizo.com/global/products/duravision/fdf2405w/index.html http://www.eizo.com/global/products/duravision/fdf2405w/inde... . And the product page suggests that there's already a ready market for it, among viewers of high-res satellite imagery: apparently the blur when scrolling such images on a mere 120Hz (and high-persistence) display is notable enough to be distracting.
- Sambdala 13y ago"A 48Kx32K pixel monitor with 24-bit-per-pixel color needs 4.6 GB videoRAM, so it will probably be about seventeen years (2012) before these perfect monitors are commonplace."
- fredsted 13y agoWe probably would've had them now if display tech didn't stop progressing in 1999....