4 ms·
Seems like they increased the font size, at least slightly? Which would definitely be a positive thing in my opinion. Anyone have side-by-side screenshots?
by kilovoltaire 13y ago
Seems like they increased the font size, at least slightly? Which would definitely be a positive thing in my opinion.
Anyone have side-by-side screenshots?
- uptown 13y agoThis page shows older versions of the site in a carousel towards the bottom: http://www.nytimes.com/redesign/ http://www.nytimes.com/redesign/
- meleva 13y agoI prefered the 2012 version. The blue titles stood out more and made it easier to scan the articles of the front page in one go
- kilovoltaire 13y agoThanks. That makes it look like I imagined the font increase, at least on the homepage.
- josefresco 13y agoSeems like 2007 was the key year for change. Since then it's been more evolutionary.
- abrowne 13y agoThe font size on the article pages now seems better, but the homepage is still tiny. I zoom the homepage 120% (two steps in Firefox), but now I don't need to zoom the article pages. With a browser that remembers zooming per-(sub)domain, this works well since I read the international edition, which has it's own subdomain.
- janlukacs 13y agoi still zoom the browser to 175% on an HD display to comfortably read. was expecting more in this regard.