So, to be clear. He wants a game. A game that he knows is is fun and high quality. A game that Nana will enjoy for hours, hopefully months. And he wants it f

So, to be clear. He wants a game. A game that he knows is is fun and high quality. A game that Nana will enjoy for hours, hopefully months. And he wants it for free. Presumably with no ads. And, he already has exactly what he's hoping for except for one detail: he also want to hide all opportunities to give money to the creators of the game. But, without "breaking the fundamental experience" of the game. Sounds to me like what he actually wants is to do the footwork (research effort) to find a high quality, pay-up-front game. And then pay for it, up front, so that Nana can enjoy the game without being confronted with iaps. It is unfortunate that the vast majority of market apparently prefers instead to wade through 9 f2p games until settling on 1 that they like enough to pay into. That market environment makes it much harder to find a good game for Nana that does not involve iaps. I wish him luck in his search for that game. But, as for hiding iaps in f2p games... I don't see how that is tenable in any way. Creating the game he wants requires a surprisingly large up-front and ongoing investment on the part of the creators. A major, if not the major, part of how the creators can expect to recoup their investment is in the opportunity to pitch you on iaps. Disabling that pitch changes the business model to "I'll pay them when I'm compelled by overwhelming guilt/appreciation". That's an incredibly idealistic business model which even the world-class awesomeness of Wikipedia has difficultly maintaining. Frankly, I doubt that any of the games he enjoys would survive it.