3 ms·
>There's always O'haskell. No, there isn't. Last update was in 2001. It was never really alive, but it is very dead now.
by Sssnake 13y ago
>There's always O'haskell.
No, there isn't. Last update was in 2001. It was never really alive, but it is very dead now.
- seanmcdirmid 13y agoRight, but it still demonstrates how nominal subtyping could be added to Haskell.