2 ms·

Indeed, which brings us to... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education I thought we,

by smtddr 13y ago

Indeed, which brings us to... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education I thought we, as a society, already concluded that separate cannot be equal. But I have to say, for some reason I don't feel the same negativity towards separation by gender as I do by race. I just think that if we've already decided that divide-by-race is a bad idea then how can divide-by-gender be good? I have a funny feeling that divide-by-political-stance, and race, is already happening due to divide-by-wealth via school fees. I wonder what the dominate race & political-affiliations are at Harvard, Stanford, Yale, etc. versus http://www.csueastbay.edu/ http://www.csueastbay.edu/

Dylan16807 13y ago
That struck down the doctrine of 'separate but equal' as a lie. But it wasn't the separate that was the problem, it was the equal. If you could truly prove that you could have separate and better, Brown v. Board of Education would not apply.