3 ms·
Pardon? I'm advocating Photoshop over Inkscape because, to my knowledge, only one of them excels at mixing raster and vector capabilities. If I want a high-res
by scott_karana 13y ago
Pardon? I'm advocating Photoshop over Inkscape because, to my knowledge, only one of them excels at mixing raster and vector capabilities.
If I want a high-resolution vector button with the modified picture of a face on it, I know which program I'm choosing.
Was I that unclear?
> Gimp is for image manipulation, not drawing buttons.
> (implied) Inkscape is for drawing buttons, not image manipulation
Photoshop is used for both image manipulation and for drawing vector buttons, in its modern incarnations. That was my point.
- phaemon 13y agoI see. So Adobe Illustrator is useless?
- scott_karana 13y agoNo, Illustrator is fantastic for its usage cases. (As I'm sure Inkscape might be) We were talking about Photoshop replacements. Despite the name, it's very much a hybrid raster/vector tool now, unlike how the GIMP was described above.