4 ms·

You remind me of the people that use Excel to do desktop publishing, or mocking up GUI screens. God bless your special breed.

• scott_karana 13y ago
  Pardon? I'm advocating Photoshop over Inkscape because, to my knowledge, only one of them excels at mixing raster and vector capabilities. If I want a high-resolution vector button with the modified picture of a face on it, I know which program I'm choosing. Was I that unclear? > Gimp is for image manipulation, not drawing buttons. > (implied) Inkscape is for drawing buttons, not image manipulation Photoshop is used for both image manipulation and for drawing vector buttons, in its modern incarnations. That was my point.
  • phaemon 13y ago
    I see. So Adobe Illustrator is useless?
    • scott_karana 13y ago
      No, Illustrator is fantastic for its usage cases. (As I'm sure Inkscape might be) We were talking about Photoshop replacements. Despite the name, it's very much a hybrid raster/vector tool now, unlike how the GIMP was described above.