3 ms·
I've run into the Gervais principle in practice too, and I have a different thought. It's a thought that I find very depressing. It seems to me that the vast m
by api 13y ago
I've run into the Gervais principle in practice too, and I have a different thought. It's a thought that I find very depressing.
It seems to me that the vast majority of people are timid, conservative, and simply too afraid to do anything. The sociopathic business hustler types I've met may be awful people, total assholes who stomp on everyone they can, but they also are unafraid. They're initiators. They make things happen.
It seems sometimes like there's two kinds of people in the world: monsters and the timid. Heroes only exist in comic books.
If this is true, then perhaps societies and economies tolerate the antics of the sociopaths because they are the only people who initiate new actions on a large scale. I definitely see that tolerance in peoples' attitudes toward "captains of industry" who have obvious narcissistic or sociopathic leanings: "sure he's an arsehole but without him there would be no X."
- wisty 13y agoThat's just not true. Personality traits are pretty well studies, and you don't just get monsters and the timid. There's plenty of people who mean well, and are "doers". Personality traits tend to be normally distributed. There's a few heroes, a few monsters, and a lot of in-betweeners; even if you're just looking at people with low anxiety and low agreeableness. And there's a reason why a lot of those "in between" movers and shakers don't try to take down the assholes - it's because these assholes generally go down in flames, eventually. It's generally not from some Batman figure taking them on, but a quantum of their peers going "nope, fuck that guy" when they temporarily hit a wall, and need someone to throw them a line.