3 ms·
Jesus. Take a look at this "patch": https://github.com/joyent/libuv/pull/1015/files https://github.com/joyent/libuv/pull/1015/files Ousted the guy because he
by znowi 13y ago
Jesus. Take a look at this "patch":
https://github.com/joyent/libuv/pull/1015/files https://github.com/joyent/libuv/pull/1015/files
Ousted the guy because he referred to "user" as a "he" in the comments? Are you fucking kidding me?
I'm all for gender equality, but the amount of drama that came out of this is just insane and disturbing for the hacker community. I can not see it as anything more than pure politics and gender issue as a convenient pretext.
Joyent has lost all credibility for me. And Ben has taken the place of the tech drama queen of the year.
- jacalata 13y agoNo, it was not because the original documentation used "he". It was because of his rejection of a suggested update, followed by his revert of the update when committed by another guy.
- vor_ 13y agoAs I understand it, Ben was following commit rules.
- ebrescia 13y agoAbsolutely agree. As a woman in tech, these types of discussions make me sick to my stomach. What an absolute waste of time and energy (except for those using it for political gain, I suppose, but they rarely achieve that through these types of shenanigans.)