3 ms·
RFC 3092 - Etymology of "Foo" (2001) (ietf.org) The 2001 in the title really should be 1 April 2001, lest someone thinks this RFC is otherwise notable in some
by taspeotis 13y ago
RFC 3092 - Etymology of "Foo" (2001) (ietf.org)
The 2001 in the title really should be 1 April 2001, lest someone thinks this RFC is otherwise notable in some way.
- Angostura 13y agoWhy? It's not a prank.
- taspeotis 13y agoAngostura 15 minutes ago | link | parent | flag Why? It's not a prank. I sense that you have a future in marketing [1]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools'_Day_Request_for_Comments http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools'_Day_Request_for_Co...
- GauntletWizard 13y agoIt depends on your definition of "prank", I guess, but most April Fools RFCs present perfectly accurate, if somewhat bizarre, takes on their subject matter. IP over Avian Carrier and IPv6 over Social Network both were implemented.