4 ms·
I have a mirror of this site. wooledge.org runs off of greycat's (#bash on freenode) home DSL connection: http://bash.cumulonim.biz/BashPitfalls.html http://ba
by mlacitation 13y ago
I have a mirror of this site. wooledge.org runs off of greycat's (#bash on freenode) home DSL connection:
http://bash.cumulonim.biz/BashPitfalls.html http://bash.cumulonim.biz/BashPitfalls.html
- wyclif 13y agoThanks. I don't understand why people submit links with content that can't be accessed by more than a few users simultaneously.
- joshbaptiste 13y agoWell it is the main reference but it won't sustain the "HN effect", thanks for the mirror link. I typically use http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/doku.php http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/doku.php which also provides a mirror and some extras.
- jamesbritt 13y agoHow would one know this in advance?
- wyclif 13y agoHow would one know in advance that submitting to HN would result in traffic consisting of more than a handful of users?
- jamesbritt 13y agoHow would one know in advance whether a site can handle high traffic? And did I really have to spell this out?
- Sivart13 13y agoSeriously? They can't find a better place to host a site like this here in 2013?
- clarry 13y agoIf you already have a machine serving stuff at home, adding a remote server is only time, money, and effort spent. Is it worth it? Not all sites are high in volume, and even well prepared sites on decent lines can go down if it hits the HN front page. People do occasionally bitch and moan about slow downloads from my home host, but nobody ever offered money for a pain-free alternative.
- jjwiseman 13y agoGoogle doc, gist, tumblr, any free blog engine.
- clarry 13y agoNone of which are pain-free to me.
- Dylan16807 13y agoDropbox? Unless you're pushing gigabytes per day it should make a perfect static host with urls no more ugly than previously mentioned services.