4 ms·
You clearly don't have a clue about how bitcoin works. If two parties want to make their transactions totally untraceable it is possible. As far as I can tell,
by atmosx 13y ago
You clearly don't have a clue about how bitcoin works. If two parties want to make their transactions totally untraceable it is possible. As far as I can tell, this transfer could be made by the same wallet, from generated address to the other in order to initiate speculations and show that BTC can actually be used for big un-taxed, non-stoppable money transfer, or it was just a way to show to the IRS what money is missing by not endorsing bitcoin asap.
- mariusz79 13y agoYou just assume that most people will know what to do and how to do it to protect themselves.
- thesimpsons1022 13y agoI assume that someone with hundreds of millions of dollars does.
- ars_technician 13y agoYou assume that software doesn't automate the process.
- tedunangst 13y agoPlease clarify how the IRS is missing money.
- atmosx 13y agoBitcoin is in Washington[1]. Washington will try to tax bitcoin if it gets accepted as an asset/currency. Moving the discussed amount of money, means that maybe someone (inside?) the USA has a huge amount of money not taxed. This is something regulatory authorities might want to change, as soon as possible. [1] http://www.bloomberg.com/video/can-the-senate-help-to-legitimize-bitcoin-2sl8eMwoT_CFE26~yaIRXA.html http://www.bloomberg.com/video/can-the-senate-help-to-legiti...
- tedunangst 13y agoHow is this different from the IRS not endorsing the euro?