3 ms·
Sadly, I don't think a study like that is likely to happen. How many families are willing to have someone hang around in their house 24/7 in order to monitor t
by bunderbunder 13y ago
Sadly, I don't think a study like that is likely to happen. How many families are willing to have someone hang around in their house 24/7 in order to monitor their child's viewing habits? How many research institutions can afford such a thing?
As far as drawing conclusions, I'm not sure it's necessary to throw the baby out with the bathwater here. Self-reporting does tend to be inaccurate in terms of absolute numbers. But as long as it tends to be accurate in relative terms - that is, that if people who say their child watches more TV tend to have children who actually do watch more TV - then we can draw relative conclusions. And the key takeaway points from this paper are still useful information even when you take the absolute numbers involved with a grain of salt. Simply knowing that TV viewing time is positively correlated with behavioral problems may not be a crystal-clear picture of the situation, but it's still useful knowledge for a parent.
- pbhjpbhj 13y ago>How many families are willing to have someone hang around in their house 24/7 in order to monitor their child's viewing habits? // That's hardly required. An app installed on tablets or face recognition on a kinect-type device or webcam can monitor screen usage and be automated. Initially it's enough to show whether any sub-category of screen-bearing device is being reported correctly. TV is probably the easiest to monitor and could well be done using a relatively inexpensive "bug" stuck on the wall.
- jwatte 13y agoThousands of families already have a Nielsen box on their tv. How is this that different? Add Kinect facial recognition if you don't want to code the data manually.