5 ms·
been looking into this recently. it seems like a lot of the bindings haven't been maintained in 2+ years, but the pure java implementation JeroMQ is very active
by kimagure 13y ago
been looking into this recently. it seems like a lot of the bindings haven't been maintained in 2+ years, but the pure java implementation JeroMQ is very active and convenient to use (https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq)
the name reminds me of jero, the american-born enka singer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba9rKhVAz80 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba9rKhVAz80)
i'm not entirely sure if i personally could come up with a good usage for zmq though, unless i were going through tons of data from sources like social media or scientific experimentation
- cremes 13y agoThe library API hasn't changed much in the past 2 years, so why would you expect the bindings to change? Just for the hell of it? The latest release (version 4) has added a few new functions, so all of the bindings are undergoing some minor revision now to support the new calls.
- buckbova 13y agoFor me, if there hasn't been activity for several years and I can't find it being widely used then I assume it abandoned.
- GrinningFool 13y agoFor me, if there hasn't been any activity for several years yet it's still commonly used, I assume it's stable.
- hintjens 13y agoThat's a fair assumption and accurate for a lot of the bindings. It is true that there are a lot of bindings for ZeroMQ and many were weekend projects for a single project. However it's normal and expected in a large community. To treat that as significant is like saying, "I find a lot of abandoned HTTP server projects, so this 'Web' thingy sure looks doubtful."
- kimagure 13y agoi find that there are at least a couple dozen issues/defects that haven't been addressed, and it doesn't seem like they're going to be