4 ms·
Nope, that's great, thanks. Here we plainly see game-theory science being conducted in the name of economics. If this is considered an economic paper, then ec
by nfoz 13y ago
Nope, that's great, thanks. Here we plainly see game-theory science being conducted in the name of economics. If this is considered an economic paper, then economics indeed can be considered a science.
(Of course not all economists are scientists, and not everything an economic scientist says is a scientific result or conclusion, but these disclaimers shouldn't be necessary.)
- atmosx 13y agoNO it's not. Repeat the same experiment using Italian or Greek or African or Chinese or Japanese students. See if you get the same results in conditions parity and then we can start discussing about it.