3 ms·
>Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. What seems extraordinary to you might not be to someone else. Go be a pretentious pseudo-intellectual som
by polof 13y ago
>Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
What seems extraordinary to you might not be to someone else. Go be a pretentious pseudo-intellectual somewhere else.
>I don't know his credentials, so it is hard figure out what to make of it.
First of all, his credentials are irrelevant (see: appeal to authority fallacy). Secondly, they are listed in the article itself, which you obviously didn't even bother reading.
- Dylan16807 13y agoThe credentials are relevant toward whether it's a prank, and also the amount of equipment he has available for diagnosis. (Does this mean I can cite you for fallacy fallacy? This game is stupid.)
- rdtsc 13y ago> What seems extraordinary to you might not be to someone else. Go be a pretentious pseudo-intellectual somewhere else. It is not extra-ordinary to you that computer viruses travel through sound waves using computer speakers and microphones, yet when this supposed "expert" tries to uncover and provide samples of it, the evidence magically disappears. > First of all, his credentials are irrelevant (see: appeal to authority fallacy). Secondly, they are listed in the article itself, which you obviously didn't even bother reading. Oh I see you are an expert on fallacies. As an exercise try finding a few fallacies in your comment.