3 ms·
It's a good idea. People don't want to think they can't afford it, so they will probably pay for it. However, I think another pricing plan could be great : It
by ced83fra 13y ago
It's a good idea. People don't want to think they can't afford it, so they will probably pay for it.
However, I think another pricing plan could be great :
It costs virtually 0/year, BUT, 50% of the first $40 of royalties are taken by the site, and the rest sent to the user. Thus the user can still see he is earning something from the first track sold.
- sitkack 13y agoThis hurts his pricing plan effectively moving EVERYONE to the "pay us when you make money" plan. I'd say 50% of the first 80$, that way they still get a check on their first sale but they ended up paying a little bit more ($20).