6 ms·
In that case, yes. But what if the domain is somedudesname.com and that is the blog of some company's CEO? It'd be preferable to have a title like "XCompany cha
by manuelflara 13y ago
In that case, yes. But what if the domain is somedudesname.com and that is the blog of some company's CEO? It'd be preferable to have a title like "XCompany changes direction, elects new leader".
- pbreit 13y agoBut he responded to a specific example. If you want to come up with more examples, fine. But don't tell him he's wrong or do a "yes, but".
- Dylan16807 13y agoThe example was only there to show that there are cases where editing the title helps. If you want to get to the best answer, don't argue against what someone said, argue against what they should have said. Being right or wrong about dismissing a bad example doesn't matter. The important thing is to fix the example and then evaluate it.
- pbreit 13y agoThen say something like: "True, for that example. But a better example is...". I guess I have a problem with jumping on someone who was correct.
- 3825 13y agoThank you for your help. I agree that the information in the URL is not always enough. I am glad it started a discussion and I hope pg reads the rebuttals to what I wrote. (github.com) is a good example. It shows why github was so eager to move gh-pages to github.io Perhaps a way to get around the ambiguity (at least in case of github) would be to encourage people to use/link to gh-pages (so we see github.io as distinct from github.com) when they are available?