3 ms·
"This is misleading. His compensation may have been effectively $10M last year, but it's almost certainly based on a stock grant several years in the past." Th
by timr 13y ago
"This is misleading. His compensation may have been effectively $10M last year, but it's almost certainly based on a stock grant several years in the past."
They hired him this year.
- kevinpet 13y agoYou're right, or at least close enough to make my comment based on faulty assumptions. It looks like they hired him without the "senior" title last year. I was basing my assumption on the article's statement that he made $10M "last year".