3 ms·
Not to mention that a faster clocked processor has to stay active for less time to achieve the same task. A similar logic explains why LTE battery life is often
by Osmium 13y ago
Not to mention that a faster clocked processor has to stay active for less time to achieve the same task. A similar logic explains why LTE battery life is often better than 3G/UMTS too.
- mathieuh 13y agoUnless I'm mistaken, isn't something like 75% of a CPU's power consumption just in pushing the clock signal around? I just assumed that a faster clock would consume more power (as a general rule). Wikipedia seems to agree with me: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_power_dissipation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_power_dissipation
- simcop2387 13y agoYes a faster clock will do that, but as mentioned by quellhorst, you won't always be running at the fastest speed. There's also another important trick Clock Gating[1] that will reduce the power even more. That's one of the places that Intel has been working on in order to get the power usage down as much as possible to make the CPU have to dissipate less heat too. With a multi-core system it's just about absolutely necessary in order to be able to avoid overheating the die. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock_gating http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock_gating
- quellhorst 13y agoYou CPU doesn't have to run at the full GHZ when it isn't in use.
- FireBeyond 13y agoAre you sure? http://gigaom.com/2012/02/17/why-lte-sucks-your-battery-that-is/ http://gigaom.com/2012/02/17/why-lte-sucks-your-battery-that...