3 ms·
I would go with none of the above. Whether or not anything you said is true (I'm doubtful but I haven't researched the subject) I would guess the reason of his
by haldujai 13y ago
I would go with none of the above. Whether or not anything you said is true (I'm doubtful but I haven't researched the subject) I would guess the reason of his burner is the stigma associated with the industry and the effects it could have on his other ventures / personal life.
The reason his industry exists is because people want it. A similar, if not worse, industry is tobacco, yet it doesn't have the same proliferation as pornography for a good reason, not as much demand. It is just as addictive and even more destructive. You also have marijuana, which is laughably easy to get in California (legally) and Amsterdam, it also is not as widespread as pornography.
If people did not want it, it would not exist.
- pornthrowaway 13y ago> I would guess the reason of his burner is the stigma associated with the industry and the effects it could have on his other ventures / personal life. Correct. This is not my full time occupation - I do it mainly as a favor, with some beer money thrown in. Probably more significantly, it affords a reasonable living to otherwise unskilled women. Their alternatives are extremely limited - if it's exploitation to give people an alternative to poverty, so be it.
- dhimes 13y agoThe women aren't being exploited- in fact, they are in control.I
- sansheriff 13y agoIf a woman's options are extremely limited and pornography is an escape from financial destitution, she is not in control. You're selling a lie and you know it.