4 ms·
I don't understand your argument at all---scientists are in it for the money? Really, what money is that? But what I find really interesting from your post is
by greeneggs 13y ago
I don't understand your argument at all---scientists are in it for the money? Really, what money is that?
But what I find really interesting from your post is the sense that scientists are supposed to be saints. You don't say this explicitly, but I get that sense from you implying that it is somehow bad for a scientist to be selfish or to want to be paid. (Or to want to be a scientist at all, since if you can't get funding then you can't work anywhere.) Are scientists all supposed to be volunteers?
Myself, I have no problem with professional scientists who selfishly want to get paid for their work. In most areas of science, the internet hivemind has had zero impact. Scientific advancement would stop dead if we stopped paying scientists.
- chii 13y ago> no problem with professional scientists who selfishly want to get paid for their work. nor do i, but if their only method of getting paid is to restrict others from using raw data till they've made their break through "discovery", then they are not worth what they are paid!