3 ms·
You're right - it is a bit sluggish. That's something we have to work on. We also need to fix the double negative issue. That said, you should be able to type
by jashmenn 13y ago
You're right - it is a bit sluggish. That's something we have to work on. We also need to fix the double negative issue.
That said, you should be able to type in a value yourself. The code is completely editable.
- seanmcdirmid 13y agoYou'll have to do some more memoization to make the performance reasonable; recomputing and redrawing everything on each change isn't very scalable. I'm working on a programming model for this: http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=201333 http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=2013... However, when you change something inside the loop, its likely that everything will have to be re-executed. The only way around this is to break up the loop somehow. Or perhaps see Umut's work on self-adjusting computation: http://www.umut-acar.org/self-adjusting-computation http://www.umut-acar.org/self-adjusting-computation Its an interesting research area.