3 ms·

Looks neat, but it's very sluggish. I kinda wish that I could just edit the field and type a value myself. Also I somehow got: shift += --99 It went into m

• jashmenn 13y ago
  You're right - it is a bit sluggish. That's something we have to work on. We also need to fix the double negative issue. That said, you should be able to type in a value yourself. The code is completely editable.
  • seanmcdirmid 13y ago
    You'll have to do some more memoization to make the performance reasonable; recomputing and redrawing everything on each change isn't very scalable. I'm working on a programming model for this: http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=201333 http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=2013... However, when you change something inside the loop, its likely that everything will have to be re-executed. The only way around this is to break up the loop somehow. Or perhaps see Umut's work on self-adjusting computation: http://www.umut-acar.org/self-adjusting-computation http://www.umut-acar.org/self-adjusting-computation Its an interesting research area.