4 ms·
"Nonsensical" and "inane blather" are relative to your personal knowledge and experience. Science and technology, to people outside of those fields, sounds like
by jared314 13y ago
"Nonsensical" and "inane blather" are relative to your personal knowledge and experience. Science and technology, to people outside of those fields, sounds like a string of nonsense jargon and technobabble. (That is one of the reasons why phys.org, university press departments, Congressman[1], and Fox News[2] can get things so very wrong.) My lack of a background in the detailed inner workings of Li-Ion batteries, or chemistry in general, prevents me from directly validating his statements. So, if it wasn't for the username looking similar to the first name on the paper, I would have written it off.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_of_tubes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_of_tubes
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6378495 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6378495
- Dylan16807 13y agoThe point is that he didn't make any statement there. So you don't need any field knowledge to realize he didn't springboard into blather, because he didn't springboard into anything at all.