3 ms·
I think he is trolling, with just enough information to sound correct. The Keccak authors have proposed a "duplex construction"[1][2], using the arbitrary lengt
by jared314 13y ago
I think he is trolling, with just enough information to sound correct. The Keccak authors have proposed a "duplex construction"[1][2], using the arbitrary length inputs/outputs and the lack of a output transformation in the sponge construction, that could be used for authenticated encryption. The NIST has yet to included that use case in the SHA-3 standard. So, until there is enough solid understanding for its correct use and tested implementations with that use, it is just a hash function.
[1] http://sponge.noekeon.org/ http://sponge.noekeon.org/ (end of the page)
[2] http://sponge.noekeon.org/SpongeDuplex.pdf http://sponge.noekeon.org/SpongeDuplex.pdf
- Dylan16807 13y ago> So, until there is enough solid understanding for its correct use and tested implementations with that use, it is just a hash function. I don't understand the logic here. Isn't the use of Keccak as a hash function currently largely-untested too? I would think you'd avoid using it at all in a production system right now, but if you're willing to use the algorithm why not use all of its capabilities? And I'm not trolling.