3 ms·
I want a pony, too. But unless I am willing to pay for it, I won't get one. You didn't answer the question--what makes you believe you are entitled to free sof
by RealCasually 13y ago
I want a pony, too. But unless I am willing to pay for it, I won't get one.
You didn't answer the question--what makes you believe you are entitled to free software from a company that employs thousands of people to write it?
- e12e 13y agoIf I had spent a million constructing a virtual pony, and I could give you a copy of it without any additional cost, I'd give you a copy of my pony. However, the pony in this analogy is the device, not the software. The software is more like the saddle -- and Google are selling ponies with their own custom designed saddle, making it hard to ride it any other way than bareback if you don't use Google's saddle - so that they can sell adwords printed on the saddle, and take a cut from everyone that sells Google compatible stirrups. At any rate, I didn't say I was entitled to it, just that I couldn't see any reason to keep it closed. I do see many reasons to keep it open.
- RealCasually 13y agoI see a great many reasons to keep it closed, not least of which is many millions of dollars worth in intellectual property.
- e12e 13y agoWhat intellectual property do you think are in the pieces that are closed, in the Google apps and apis for android? There's certainly a lot of work put into making the stuff work -- but opening up the code won't make it stop working for Google. And I really doubt there's much fancy in there - mostly just grunt work to implement some straightforward ideas. I fail to see how opening that up under something like the GPL or AGPL, preventing someone to (legally) take the code and "run away" with it -- will lower the value of the Android system.