4 ms·
One thing that in hindsight may be related that's not on the timeline is the DoJ losing its lawsuit against Google in January 2006. "Google Resists U.S. Subpoe
by espeed 13y ago
One thing that in hindsight may be related that's not on the timeline is the DoJ losing its lawsuit against Google in January 2006.
"Google Resists U.S. Subpoena of Search Data" (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/20/technology/20google.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/20/technology/20google.html?p...)
"Judge tells DoJ 'No' on search queries" (http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/judge-tells-doj-no-on-search-queries.html http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/judge-tells-doj-no-on...)
According to the slides (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Prism_slide_5.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Prism_slide_5.jpg), the PRISM timeline begins the next year on 9/11/2007, and Google is added on January 14, 2009, almost 3 years to the day after the the DoJ ruling and only a few days before Obama takes office.
In a Q&A after a talk at Stanford in 2006, Marissa Mayer is asked, "How much information does Google share with the Federal Government?"
Here is her answer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soYKFWqVVzg#t=1819 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soYKFWqVVzg#t=1819
- fsckin 13y ago~30:15 for those with devices that dont skip to the linked time.