3 ms·
Last year Google spent $18,220,000 lobbying Congress -- #8 on the top spenders list (http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2012&indexType=s http://w
by espeed 13y ago
Last year Google spent $18,220,000 lobbying Congress -- #8 on the top spenders list (http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2012&indexType=s http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2012&index...). That's not fiction, but it's a drop in Google's coffers.
And the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Elec...) removed the ban which prevented corporations from using their treasury funds for direct advocacy.
- dragonwriter 13y agoI didn't say corporate lobbying was a fiction, I said corporations as independent entities are a convenient fiction; corporations are tools through which individuals exercise power, not real entities that have power of their own.
- res0nat0r 13y agoGoogle's mission statement is: to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. It isn't to fall on it's sword and risk the entirety of the company fighting the US government on principale. I'd argue that doing that putting out of work tens of thousands of people in the worst case would "be evil". http://www.google.com/about/ http://www.google.com/about/
- espeed 13y ago#1 of its core philosophies is: "Focus on the user and all else will follow." (http://www.google.com/about/company/philosophy/ http://www.google.com/about/company/philosophy/) Don't you think safeguarding its users data and keeping their trust would fall under that? From a business perspective, if Google loses the trust of its users, it's the beginning of the end. Safeguarding user trust should be priority #1.
- res0nat0r 13y agoThey do safeguard their users data. They also comply with laws under which they are subject to, they aren't mutually exclusive.