3 ms·
Not quite - I think his point was that money managers with very large sums to invest cannot beat the market. He made that claim almost 40 years ago, and more re
by MarkMc 13y ago
Not quite - I think his point was that money managers with very large sums to invest cannot beat the market. He made that claim almost 40 years ago, and more recently his own record clearly contradicts it. So perhaps he no longer holds such a view...
Edit: It looks like Buffett had changed his view by 1984 [1]: "Size is the anchor of performance. There is no question about it. It doesn't mean you can't do better than average when you get larger, but the margin shrinks."
[1] http://www.tilsonfunds.com/superinvestors.html http://www.tilsonfunds.com/superinvestors.html
- e12e 13y agoOr, perhaps the stock market doesn't reflect value, and insider trading (in one form or another) is the norm, not the exception?
- foobarian 13y agoIt's simple math. A money manager controlling 100% of the market by definition can't beat the average ;) So the potential for good performance must increase along that spectrum.