5 ms·

scanning all 65,535 ports of a /16 subnet in 45 min ...or in other words: scanning all ports in the reserved Class C range, from 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.2

scanning all 65,535 ports of a /16 subnet in 45 min ...or in other words: scanning all ports in the reserved Class C range, from 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.255.255, in 45 min

jlgaddis 13y ago
> ... "class C" ... I realize lots of people are simply in the habit of saying "Class C" when what they really mean is a /24, "Class B" for a /16, etc. but classless routing[0] has been around for 20 years now and these terms need to go away. [0]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing
- cwb71 13y ago
  Except that qwerty_asdf wasn't referring to a /24 subnet, (s)he was talking about one of the three address spaces defined in RFC 1918 and described thusly: "Note that (in pre-CIDR notation) the first block is nothing but a single class A network number, while the second block is a set of 16 contiguous class B network numbers, and third block is a set of 256 contiguous class C network numbers." So it is common for crusty old network engineers and sysadmins to refer to 192.168/16 as "the class C" private block, even when they understand that you can subnet it however you'd like.
  - jlgaddis 13y ago
    > ... (s)he was talking about one of the three address spaces defined ... Right, I realized that when s/he said "reserved Class C range". It was more of a general observation. I always forget I have to be extremely specific here on HN.
- Dylan16807 13y ago
  Why should the terms go away? Obviously the networks have been widely broken up and shuffled around, but I see nothing wrong with calling 11.5.0.0/16 a class B network.
  - jlgaddis 13y ago
    Because classful networking went out the window 20 years ago. Case in point: 11.5.0.0/16 is not a Class B network and never was. (11.0.0.0/8, however, was/"is" a Class A network). /16 != Class B network.
    - Dylan16807 13y ago
      I used 11 for a reason, yes. It's not a class B network under the old system. Because under the old system 11.5.0.0/16 didn't exist. But you can make such a network now, and if you were to classify its size the appropriate letter is 'B'.

scanning all 65,535 ports of a /16 subnet in 45 min ...or in other words: scanning all ports in the reserved Class C range, from 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.255.255, in 45 min

jlgaddis 13y ago

> ... "class C" ... I realize lots of people are simply in the habit of saying "Class C" when what they really mean is a /24, "Class B" for a /16, etc. but classless routing[0] has been around for 20 years now and these terms need to go away. [0]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing

cwb71 13y ago
Except that qwerty_asdf wasn't referring to a /24 subnet, (s)he was talking about one of the three address spaces defined in RFC 1918 and described thusly: "Note that (in pre-CIDR notation) the first block is nothing but a single class A network number, while the second block is a set of 16 contiguous class B network numbers, and third block is a set of 256 contiguous class C network numbers." So it is common for crusty old network engineers and sysadmins to refer to 192.168/16 as "the class C" private block, even when they understand that you can subnet it however you'd like.
- jlgaddis 13y ago
  > ... (s)he was talking about one of the three address spaces defined ... Right, I realized that when s/he said "reserved Class C range". It was more of a general observation. I always forget I have to be extremely specific here on HN.
Dylan16807 13y ago
Why should the terms go away? Obviously the networks have been widely broken up and shuffled around, but I see nothing wrong with calling 11.5.0.0/16 a class B network.
- jlgaddis 13y ago
  Because classful networking went out the window 20 years ago. Case in point: 11.5.0.0/16 is not a Class B network and never was. (11.0.0.0/8, however, was/"is" a Class A network). /16 != Class B network.
  - Dylan16807 13y ago
    I used 11 for a reason, yes. It's not a class B network under the old system. Because under the old system 11.5.0.0/16 didn't exist. But you can make such a network now, and if you were to classify its size the appropriate letter is 'B'.