3 ms·

In the USSR they were called apparatchiks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apparatchik http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apparatchik It's sort of funny how Soviet bus

• dragonwriter 13y ago
  > It's sort of funny how Soviet business culture actually is. Capitalist heirarchies look like state heirarchies in a system widely criticized as being "State Capitalism". Funny to the people who think that the Soviet Union represents the polar opposite of capitalism, expected by the left-libertarians who noted that the Soviet Union recapitulated the features of capitalism central to the socialist critique of capitalism.
  • lmm 13y ago
    It goes more in the opposite direction I think. "The Firm" has a centrally planned economy that in the case of an organization like Google can easily be as big as a small country. So it naturally tends to behave the same way as any other large centrally planned economy.
    • dragonwriter 13y ago
      The thing to understand is that the socialist critique of capitalism has always been that it is a system in which, both on the "micro" scale of firms and the "macro" scale of broader institutions, is centrally organized for the benefit of a narrow elite, with a distinct and well-defined (though, in the case of the "macro" scale, less formal than is the case in, e.g., feudalism) social heirarchy. The heirarchical megacorporation existed before socialists invented the name "capitalism" to refer to and criticize the system which spawned such beasts, so the Soviet Union mirroring the heirarchical structure of such an entity -- with a similar elite vs. worker power relationship -- is exactly the USSR recapitulating features of capitalism central to the socialist critique, and not "the opposite direction".