7 ms·
10 websites are actually running WEBrick in production. Nice.
by robbles 13y ago
10 websites are actually running WEBrick in production. Nice.
- igul222 13y agoI think Heroku's default Rails app server is WEBRick: https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/ruby#webserver https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/ruby#webserver
- hayksaakian 13y agoim pretty sure it's thin
- matthewrudy 13y agoIt will run thin if the gem is installed. Otherwise it falls back to Webrick. Rack itself favours thin, puma, and webrick (in that order). https://github.com/rack/rack/blob/6829a8a0f416ea49a18f1e3e532ed1ece24e9ea4/lib/rack/handler.rb#L57 https://github.com/rack/rack/blob/6829a8a0f416ea49a18f1e3e53...
- ante_annum 13y agoI'll go out on a limb and guess that the majority of those were "Show HN: my weekend project" submissions, not really production systems.
- fusiongyro 13y agoOnly 13 people using Lighttpd. I remember the week and a half when that was the preferred deployment platform for Rails. That was a while ago.
- coolnow 13y agoI run nginx on my Pi for a personal site for friends, and Lighttpd on a VPS for a very small site with a few gifs and low visitors. The Lighttpd regularly goes down to like 5-10MB memory usage which is really interesting, whereas nginx seems to cache more in RAM. Either way, both seem to work extremely well for low RAM (and the slow CPU on the Pi).
- bigiain 13y agoI suspect that might be under represented by people using Lighttpd for serving static content, with something else like Apache serving the main page html (Ive got a bunch of clients in that configuration with WordPress running on Apache, and all the images/css/js/etc coming out of Lighttpd.)
- scott_karana 13y agoThat should also be true of nginx, but it's pretty well represented now.
- paraboul 13y agonginx is not only good a serving static file but is a (one of the most?) common reverse proxy server.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]