3 ms·
I'll not front: that's a much uglier device than Glass, and Glass isn't exactly the height of fashion. Plus it lacks much of the functionality that Glass has. I
by Kapura 13y ago
I'll not front: that's a much uglier device than Glass, and Glass isn't exactly the height of fashion. Plus it lacks much of the functionality that Glass has. I believe a legitimate competitor to Glass will emerge at some point, but this is more like a cheap knock-off.
- thret 13y agoCheap knock-offs drive acceptance, I wouldn't get one either but I'm happy to see it in the market.
- threeseed 13y agoNo it doesn't. Premium products used by people you aspire to drive acceptance. Cheap knock-offs are for the mass market.
- likeclockwork 13y agoSuperficial celebrity-worshiping elitism drives acceptance!
- Giarty 13y agoYou're right, but the design will improve very much. We are in the middle of the world biggest eyewear industry, and we're making agreements with them for the frame. The point of these first prototypes was only to prove, first of all to ourselves, that the system could fit in little room and weight.