3 ms·
I disagree. I had the opportunity to work on a Windows 8 (metro) project and was quite excited by the idea (and I'm a young developer). However, after developin
by k-mcgrady 13y ago
I disagree. I had the opportunity to work on a Windows 8 (metro) project and was quite excited by the idea (and I'm a young developer). However, after developing for it I wouldn't again for two reasons:
1. There just aren't enough people using Windows 8 and downloading apps yet
2. MS approval process is much, much worse than Apple's. They even included things like grammar errors in the review.
- weland 13y ago> They even included things like grammar errors in the review. The review had grammar errors? Or they pointed out your application has grammar errors?
- k-mcgrady 13y agoThey reviewed my app and wouldn't accept it until I fixed a grammar error.
- weland 13y agoI think that's perfectly acceptable, really. The presentation layer is where much of the user experience is clustered, and correct use of the displayed language is part of it. A grammar mistake is as much a bug as a misplaced button is.
- seanmcdirmid 13y agoI would take this as a plus actually: they were being very detailed oriented and pointing out more mistakes than would have been expected. I doubt its sustainable though, as soon as the app load increases, they'll probably become more like Apple in detail orientation (unless they are using tools, I'm not sure, I have no idea).