3 ms·
That would require more resources than is possible with a limited budget for the number of people the creators intended. And far more than is needed for hosting
by eksith 13y ago
That would require more resources than is possible with a limited budget for the number of people the creators intended. And far more than is needed for hosting a site.
What you ask for is already possible for a few bucks a month with countless VPS hosts. This is free, remember?
Also, the OP isn't part of the NeoCities team. He's merely an advocate for it.
- Dylan16807 13y agoDon't just say it takes resources, give a plausible mechanism. I can't think of any way for subdirectories to take more load than normal files in one directory. Am I not being creative enough?
- trotsky 13y agoI have no idea how neocities is implemented, but my first thought as far as implementing something like that wouldn't be to give users actual filesystem access, but rather to put everything in an object store. Typically that'd be flat until you bolt on something to simulate a hierarchy.
- Dylan16807 13y agoIf you're doing that you can allow object names to have "/" and get directory simulation for free.
- johnchristopher 13y agoThat would require more resources on the server side than simply storing flat files in directories.
- trotsky 13y agoand way less effort to cluster or shard
- eksith 13y agoCluster, I can understand, but why shard? I've run forums even on rickety DIY PHP + Postgres that's held up very nicely to several hundred logins and even more sessions per day on very modest hardware (1.5Ghz Core 2 duo, 2Gb memory). It doesn't take a boatload of resources for a simple login and static content if it's just static content. Sites can be separated (or "sharded" if you like that term) on Nginx with very little effort for static content. E.G. https://gist.github.com/perusio/2154289 https://gist.github.com/perusio/2154289 There are more elegant solutions for that which still don't require blob objects.