3 ms·
While we are on pet peeves, how about the use of "blah blah blah after the jump" and then there is not, in fact, a jump. E.G. http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/l
by antiismist 17y ago
While we are on pet peeves, how about the use of "blah blah blah after the jump" and then there is not, in fact, a jump.
E.G. http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/ladies-and-gentlemen-the-red-neck-tank-top http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/ladies-and-gentlemen-the-red...
- knightinblue 17y agoThat's because you're already on the full article page. If you saw it on the main page of the blog, it'd make perfect sense, since the full pic isn't featured on the main page. Basically, the phrase 'blah-blah after the jump' should be removed from the full article, which this blogger didn't do.
- antiismist 17y agoThanks for the explanation. Because of aggregators I hardly ever see the front page of blogs anymore.
- derefr 17y agoWell, envisioning the souce of most blogging engines, the actual post source text probably goes something like this: blah blah blah after the jump<!--jump--><img ... which is then split at the <!--jump--> comment, and the first part shown on the main page + feeds, while the entire thing is shown on the permalinked page. Rearranging it to eliminate your quarrel would require replacing <!--jump--> with a little SSI-like <!--if fullpage--><!--else--><!--endif-->, which is a lot more complicated for not much reward.