3 ms·
Yeah, well, [your preferred development stack] sucks because [subjective and/or political reason] that [anyone who agrees with me] knows is obviously true. Clea
by mindajar 13y ago
Yeah, well, [your preferred development stack] sucks because [subjective and/or political reason] that [anyone who agrees with me] knows is obviously true. Clearly, [vendor of your preferred development stack] should go spend many years rewriting everything so that my mind can continue living comfortably in the box it's in, safe from the pain of having to learn something different.
- jokoon 13y ago> political reason congressmen ! Seriously ? > [your preferred development stack] sucks I don't prefer anything, but making things work between systems is a pain, and I thought portable languages were the thing that allowed those systems to run the same programs. I just think that trashing portions of technologies that worked on other systems, is debatable. > Clearly, [vendor of your preferred development stack] should go spend many years rewriting everything so that my mind can continue living comfortably in the box it's in, safe from the pain of having to learn something different. Yeah, maybe. At the time I adopted Ogre3D, I thought its code would run on any OS. I would really like to know the good reasons that push companies to break backward compatibility. Carbon comes to mind. Most other OSes think backward compatibility is important. But now, we move faster than light, screw the weak ones who won't learn all the new stuff !