3 ms·

EDIT: Apparently the OP was being sarcastic, and I failed to read deep enough into the ASCII characters. But if he hadn't been sarcastic, I would've still said

EDIT: Apparently the OP was being sarcastic, and I failed to read deep enough into the ASCII characters. But if he hadn't been sarcastic, I would've still said what I said below. What the hell? I had to read this over 6 times to make sure I was understanding it correctly. "Women are sensitive, fragile, inferior creatures who require constant, vigilant protection from honorable men." That right there ladies and gentlemen, is the thinking that permeates and sustains misogyny throughout our world. I understand that the original poster had good intentions, but the way is high and his eyes are definitely upon the ground. Women are not sensitive, fragil, or inferior. Please avoid false blanket statements like this.

rlt 13y ago
Hint: sarcasm
- Metrop0218 13y ago
  Ah, pretty poorly worded sarcasm there.
  - rlt 13y ago
    Subtle sarcasm is the best sarcasm, IMHO.
    - vacri 13y ago
      Not in text. There are too few cues available to avoid Poe's law.
jff 13y ago
It's sarcasm, dumbass.
- Metrop0218 13y ago
  It's pretty poorly done sarcasm, as many others didn't believe it either, asshole.
  - Dylan16807 13y ago
    Sarcasm means you're not supposed to believe it. You were right the first five times you read it; you should have stopped there. I don't see any way in which this sarcasm was done poorly.
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]