4 ms·
He's not talking about 30k rows, he's talking about 30k people. It could easily be big data if you monitor & document their every working moment, but they prob
by ownagefool 13y ago
He's not talking about 30k rows, he's talking about 30k people. It could easily be big data if you monitor & document their every working moment, but they probably aren't doing that so you're probably right.
- raverbashing 13y agoYes, 30k people, so it's what? Some interview reports, some performance reviews, HR report/history of the employee? It really doesn't look like something big.
- jedc 13y ago1 million applications received. Say 10% of those go into some sort of evaluation process = 100k assessments/year. Say 10% of those go through an interview panel of (on average 3 interviews) = 30k assessments/year For 30k employees with (say on average) 2 assessments per year = 60k assessments/year. So 1 million CVs per year on which to do some sort of evaluations, and 200k individual assessments per year. Over the past five years that roughly 6 million data points. Since there's no hard-and-fast rule on this, that's why I called it small Big Data.
- chris_mahan 13y agoEven if it's 100 million rows. That's something a single beefy server with SQL Server 2012 can handle. That's not big data. Big data is a million times 100 million rows.
- shawabawa3 13y ago> Big data is a million times 100 million rows. [citation needed] This whole thread is pointless. There is no definition of Big data.
- raverbashing 13y agoThis may be a definition: https://twitter.com/DEVOPS_BORAT/status/288698056470315008 https://twitter.com/DEVOPS_BORAT/status/288698056470315008